Deepseek R1: What is all the fuss about?

In partnership with

Dear Reader…

We are not even at the end of January and the disruptive force of AI is now being felt across global markets. The release of DeepSeek R1 triggered a substantial sell-off across tech stocks:

1. Nvidia experienced a 17% drop, erasing $589 billion in market value - the largest single-day loss for any company in history.

2. The Nasdaq fell by 3%, with other semiconductor and AI firms like AMD and Broadcom also facing significant declines.

3. Approximately $1 trillion was wiped off across both US and European markets.

This dramatic one-day fall was entirely predictable as the AI models become exponentially better, faster and cheaper to deliver. The release of the R1 model is representative of many more upheavals to come characterised by:

• Cost disruption: DeepSeek R1's development cost of $5.6 million challenges the billions invested in US AI companies in developing LLM’s. 

• Performance parity: The model's comparable performance to leading US models at a fraction of the cost raises questions about the sustainability of high valuations in the tech sector.

• Democratisation of AI: DeepSeek R1's open-source nature and cost-efficiency make advanced AI more accessible, potentially reshaping the competitive landscape19.

• Geopolitical concerns: The rise of a Chinese AI model challenging US dominance has sparked comparisons to the Cold War "Sputnik moment" in the space race.

A Data Engineer’s Perspective on R1’s Risks and Rewards

Practically speaking, this model represents both a transformative opportunity and a complex challenge. This week we will break down the implications of its availability, architecture, and deployment costs through the lens of data engineering.

1. Availability: The Open-Source Disruption

📈 Rewards

• Customisation Freedom: As a fully open-source model under the MIT license, R1 allows engineers to inspect, modify, and optimise the codebase for specific use cases—a luxury rarely available with proprietary models like GPT-4 or Gemini.

• Cost Elimination: No licensing fees mean teams can experiment freely without budget approvals, democratising access to cutting-edge AI for startups and enterprises alike.

• Transparency Advantage: Full visibility into the model’s architecture enables better debugging, security audits, and compliance checks—critical for industries like healthcare or finance.

⚠️ Risks

• Support Vacuum: Unlike commercial models backed by dedicated engineering teams, R1 relies on community support. Critical bugs or vulnerabilities may lack timely fixes.

• Security Exposure: Publicly available code could help malicious actors identify attack vectors, requiring engineers to implement additional security layers.

• Version Fragmentation: Competing forks of the model could create compatibility issues in production pipelines.

2. Architectural Innovations

Mixture of Experts (MoE) is a neural network architecture that divides a model into specialised sub-networks ("experts"), each trained to handle specific types of inputs. In DeepSeek R1, the MoE framework uses 671 billion parameters but activates only 37 billion per query via a router mechanism. This router dynamically selects the most relevant experts for a given input, slashing computational costs by ~80% compared to dense models of similar size. For example, a query about quantum computing might activate physics and math experts, while a poetry request engages language and creativity experts. This selective activation enables high performance without the energy and hardware demands of traditional monolithic models.

Reinforcement Learning (RL) trains models through trial-and-error interactions with an environment. Unlike supervised learning (which relies on labeled datasets), RL uses reward signals to guide the model toward desired behaviors. DeepSeek R1’s "R1-Zero" variant was trained using pure RL—no supervised fine-tuning—where the model generated responses, received feedback (e.g., correctness scores), and iteratively improved its policy (decision-making strategy). This approach excels at complex reasoning tasks but requires careful reward function design to avoid unintended behaviors.

Group Relative Policy Optimisation (GRPO) is DeepSeek’s innovation to streamline RL training. Traditional methods like Proximal Policy Optimisation (PPO) use separate "critic" models to estimate the value of actions, doubling infrastructure costs. GRPO eliminates critics by comparing actions within groups of responses, using relative rankings instead of absolute rewards. For instance, when evaluating 10 candidate answers to a math problem, GRPO ranks them against each other rather than scoring each individually. This reduces computational overhead by 30% and simplifies the training pipeline, though it demands high-quality ranking mechanisms to maintain stability.

Together, these technologies enable R1’s efficiency: MoE optimises inference costs, RL enhances adaptive reasoning, and GRPO cuts training expenses—a trifecta reshaping how data engineers approach large-scale AI deployment.

⛔️ Some Downsides

• Routing Complexity: Implementing efficient expert selection algorithms requires specialized knowledge of attention mechanisms and load balancing.

• Latency Overheads: While MoE reduces compute per token, network latency between distributed experts could bottleneck real-time applications.

• Unpredictable Outputs: Pure RL-trained models may exhibit erratic behavior in edge cases, requiring robust monitoring systems.

• Reproducibility Challenges: GRPO’s performance heavily depends on reward function design—a process lacking standardised best practices.

3. Deployment Costs: The Double-Edged Sword

👏🏼 Substantial Cost Reduction

• Budget Democratisation: Small teams can now deploy state-of-the-art AI without cloud vendor lock-in or exorbitant compute budgets.

• Energy Efficiency: 8-bit quantisation and pipeline parallelism reduce power consumption per inference by 4x compared to dense models.

👎🏼 Important Considerations

• Hidden Optimisation Costs: While R1’s base efficiency is impressive, achieving peak performance requires:

  • Custom CUDA kernels for MoE operations

  • Fine-grained pipeline parallelism configurations

  • Advanced quantisation-aware training

• Skill Gap: Most data engineers lack experience with MoE architectures or RL pipelines, necessitating costly upskilling programs.

• Tooling Immaturity: Existing MLOps platforms (e.g., MLFlow, Kubeflow) don’t natively support R1’s unique architecture, forcing custom integrations.

4. Strategic Recommendations for Data Teams

We recommend developing an adoption playbook that structures any adoption that

• Starts with Non-Critical Workloads: Deploy R1 for internal analytics or low-risk customer interactions before mission-critical applications.

• Invest in MoE-Optimised Infrastructure:

  • Use NVIDIA’s Triton Inference Server with custom MoE backends

  • Implement FPGA-based routers for expert selection

• Build Hybrid Systems: Combine R1’s reasoning strength with smaller, domain-specific models for cost-sensitive tasks.

And mitigate security and performance risks by:

• Implementing runtime anomaly detection (e.g., AWS GuardDuty for AI)

• Using homomorphic encryption for sensitive inference tasks

• Benchmarking against baseline models using tools like DeepSeek’s own Evaluation Harness

• Partner with cloud providers offering R1-optimised instances (e.g., AWS EC2 R1 instances). Platforms like Perplexity already allow you to experiment with the R1 model - in fact we used R1 to research this article and we can say subjectively it performed better than the US-based models that we are used to using.

5. The Future of Data Engineering

The reason for all the fuss around DeepSeek R1 isn’t because it is just another AI model—it’s a harbinger of industry-wide shifts that are rapidly unfolding in 2025. It has significant implications for you, your team and your business. Some of these include:

1. Rise of the “Full-Stack” Data & AI Engineer: Professionals will need skills in distributed systems, RL, and hardware optimisation to manage models like R1.

2. Infrastructure Simplification: As models grow more efficient, the trend toward billion-parameter models in edge devices will accelerate.

3. New Specialisations: Roles like “MoE Architect” or “RL Pipeline Engineer” will emerge as critical hires.

🔭 Keeping it in perspective

While the events of the last few days have been dramatic, we think that for data engineers, DeepSeek R1 is more akin to the Hadoop revolution of 2006—a disruptive technology that redefines what’s possible while demanding new skills and paradigms. The rewards (cost savings, flexibility, performance) are substantial, but so are the risks (complexity, security, talent gaps). Teams that strategically balance these factors will gain a decisive advantage in the AI-driven economy. As the industry adapts, one truth becomes clear: the era of “bigger is better” AI is over; the age of “smarter, leaner, and open” has begun.

That’s a wrap for this week